Notebook AtlasSURG0002 · Research methods: go to the course map

Fig. 1

Diabetic foot ulcers treated with a dermal substitute: graft failure by HbA1c band against the < 6.5% band (patients)

Fig. 1. Two groups of patients, one dot each. Higher band: 6 failed out of 14. Below 6.5% (reference): 0 failed out of 40. Lit: everyone in each group. Dividing gives 35.53 times; the names for these are risk and risk ratio.

Higher band: failed
6 out of 14
Below 6.5% (reference): failed
0 out of 40
Dividing (risk ratio)
35.53 times
Subtracting (risk difference)
about 42 more in every 100

2×2 Workbench · First look

Compare as compare as

Level 1 · First look · Lecture 11 · p.35–38, 48–49

Compare groups when the outcome is a measurement, an ordered exposure or a time, in plain words.

Choose the effect measure for quantitative, time-to-event and ordinal-exposure data, and tell 'effect size' (SMD) from 'effect measure'.

  1. Average gap (the step you are on)

    day-14 wound closure averages 72% vs 64%, an 8-point gap.

    When the outcome is a measurement, compare the averages: day-14 wound closure averages 72% with the dermal substitute and 64% without, a gap of 72 − 64 = 8 points.

step 1/4