Notebook AtlasSURG0002 · Research methods: go to the course map

Fig. 1

PBL 3 mouse TACE study (IPN hydrogel vs lipiodol, 5 mice per group): risk of bias in seven domains, before and after design fixes

Fig. 1, A checklist before the experiment (First look). A mouse study: a new gel vs the standard oil for blocking a liver tumour’s blood supply, 5 mice per group, tumour damage scored under the microscope. No changes made yet. Traffic lights: Groups alike at the start? Can’t tell; Who got into the study? Low risk; Who got what, recorded right? Low risk; Same care in both groups? Can’t tell; Every mouse counted? Can’t tell; Results scored fairly? Can’t tell; All results shown? Can’t tell.

Low risk
2/7
Can’t tell
5
High risk
0

Bias Scenario Classifier · First look

Changes to the plan fix
Say how the groups were randomised sequence stated
Keep the next group secret allocation concealed
Carers don’t know the group carers blinded
Account for every mouse flow reported
Hide group labels from the scorer scorer blinded
Publish the plan first protocol registered

Level 1 · First look · Lecture 8 · p.86–90

Use a checklist before an experiment to catch problems early.

Use the risk-of-bias domains to design a study before collecting data and revise it until each domain is low risk; know the NC3Rs EDA and clinical-relevance tools exist.

  1. Pre-flight checklist (the step you are on)

    Pilots run their checks before take-off, not after landing.

    Pilots run their checks before take-off, not after landing. The mouse plan before any changes: 2/7 areas low risk, 5 we can’t tell.

step 1/3